[Arm-netbook] EOMA68 In A Intel Card World?

[Allan Mwenda]

Indeed there is no need for royalties, and the lack of it is worth advertising and will grab attention.
I also think you should advertise the low power of the standard that's a big plus.



On January 10, 2017 11:33:14 AM GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
>---
>crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Allan Mwenda <allanitomwesh at gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Definitely put no royalty fees at the top.
>
> to be taken seriously, like for example the HDMI standard, compliance
>with the EOMA68 standard has to be outsourced to accredited
>Certification Companies (such as ACG-Cert).
>
> these companies, obviously, will need to be paid.  it will,
>obviously, be a one-off cost per test.  recertification _is_ likely to
>be needed... again this will, obviously, be a one-off cost per test.
>
> i don't see any need for "royalties".
>
>l.
>
>_______________________________________________
>arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
>http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/attachments/20170110/55342cf6/attachment.html>