<html><head></head><body>Indeed there is no need for royalties, and the lack of it is worth advertising and will grab attention.<br>
I also think you should advertise the low power of the standard that's a big plus.<br>
<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On January 10, 2017 11:33:14 AM GMT+03:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">---<br />crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: <a href="https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68">https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68</a><br /><br /><br />On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Allan Mwenda <allanitomwesh@gmail.com> wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> Definitely put no royalty fees at the top.<br /></blockquote><br /> to be taken seriously, like for example the HDMI standard, compliance<br />with the EOMA68 standard has to be outsourced to accredited<br />Certification Companies (such as ACG-Cert).<br /><br /> these companies, obviously, will need to be paid. it will,<br />obviously, be a one-off cost per test. recertification _is_ likely to<br />be needed... again this will, obviously, be a one-off cost per test.<br /><br /> i don't see any need for "royalties".<br /><br />l.<br /><br /><hr /><br />arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk<br /><a href="http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook">http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook</a><br />Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk</pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>