[Arm-netbook] OT: Librem 5?

[zap]

> Stallman is absolutely right. If you heart is in the right place you
> will imediately understand the benefits of the free culture movement
> for everyone. The fact that we are not there yet is due to actions
> from big interests that want to keep sharing limited to the old model
> and due to the fact that society hasn't really caught up with it yet.
> But we are getting there. The fact that we can now make infinite
> copies of a piece of art/software and freely share them but we are
> artificially shutting the door to it just blows my mind...
>
>
Yep, it doesn't make too much sense.
But also, piracy was a term coined  to make drm easier to implement
without people freaking out against people in power/corporations.

In all truth though, piracy is an extreme word to use for freely sharing
software.

I don't agree that it should be called piracy at all. Matter of fact,
copyright is unenforceable when it comes to the people that it was
trying to stop in the first place.
copyright was *ORIGINALLY...* to stop people from selling their own
copies of someone else's software and act like it is theirs
but now they have expanded it so far that it is now okay to do that
which is wrong... *INVADING PEOPLE's PRIVACY!!! *and you cannot remove
that part unless you reverse engineer it. Which should be a non-issue.
Screw *DRM.* that is all.