I don't like it, I dunno. It's bland.
On January 30, 2017 2:19:04 AM GMT+03:00, James L james6.28318530@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good.
Could I ask you to produce variants of this:
- without colour
https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321752
- low resolution/small size
100p wide: https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321542
- (1) & (2)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321642
The reason is that a logo is going to be used in many places and
still has to be
robustly recognisable. So all candidate logos should be 'tested' by
checking how
they look when mangled as above.
Regards
Licenses: Same as before (Whatever lkcl wants, otherwise cc-sa-by-4.0)
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk