I don't like it, I dunno. It's bland.

On January 30, 2017 2:19:04 AM GMT+03:00, James L <james6.28318530@gmail.com> wrote:

Looks good.

Could I ask you to produce variants of this:

1) without colour

https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321752

2) low resolution/small size

100p wide:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321542

3) (1) & (2)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/151565999@N03/32445321642

The reason is that a logo is going to be used in many places and still has to be
robustly recognisable. So all candidate logos should be 'tested' by checking how
they look when mangled as above.

Regards

Licenses: Same as before (Whatever lkcl wants, otherwise cc-sa-by-4.0)



arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.