[Arm-netbook] Meltdown and Spectre
jackhill at jackhill.us
Fri Jan 5 04:55:49 GMT 2018
On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, Jack Hill wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, Adam Van Ymeren wrote:
>> The thing about Meltdown/Spectre is that they're really only problems if
>> you rely on sandboxing to run untrusted code.
> I'm not convinced that sandboxing is only useful for untrusted code.
> Sometimes my trusted code has bugs (e.g. I would like to be able to look
> at random images or documents or expose my webapp to the world), and
> I would really like for it to not be able to be tricked into doing
> something it shouldn't. I would also like to be able to compute in shared
Oh, I guess it might be helpful to explain a little bit more why I would
like to be able to continue to use shared computing environments. I've
been increasing amazed and intimidated by what it takes to understand
modern computing. One of my outlets for these emotions is Hcoöp , which
is an internet service hosting coöperative. We run services such as email,
web, and file collaboratively, which saves any one person for having to do
all that work on their own. I appreciate the work of projects like
Freedombox, but why stop the collaborating after writing the code? I want
to be able to collaborate on running it as well!
In addition, some things just don't make sense for all of us to own on our
own. I might not often need a large memory or hundreds of core compute
cluster, but when I do, it is nice to be able to use a shared resource
rather than purchasing my own.
More information about the arm-netbook