[Arm-netbook] EOMA68 / Libre RISC-V team financing (Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton)
charlesrcard at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 1 07:58:42 GMT 2018
> ...i am back
> - once again - to being DEPENDENT on donations and sponsorship and,
> once a fucking gain getting money from contract work and/or having to
> consider enslavement i mean employment which i know that people will
> say "you're wasting your time, you're a threat to our jobs".
I backed this project because I feel what you are doing is extraordinary.I want to provide some additional funding, but I rather not open another
account. Will paypal work for you?
As Lee Camp would say "Keep fighting"
On Sunday, December 31, 2017 6:39 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 8:31 PM, zap <calmstorm at posteo.de> wrote:
> On 12/31/2017 05:17 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado at elephly.net> wrote:
>>> Hi Luke,
>>>> Just one question: is canceling support for the CrowdSupply campaign an
>>>> option if you go through with this?
>>> I’m quoting this, because I very much agree with Julie and others who
>>> oppose Bitcoin.
>> ricardo: it's a little late... and also no longer relevant. it's too
>> late because i had *already* - 34 days ago - used personal bitcoin
>> mined over five years ago that has absolutely no connection WHATSOEVER
>> to the EOMA68 project's (cash, USD/RMB) funds, and second it's no
>> longer relevant because it's been established that it's a long-term
>> investment not an "immediate financing of this and all possible
>> projects we ever wanted to be funded" opportunity.
>> so your opposition is noted, respected... and at the same time can be
> I must admit, I would not trust bitcoin either, but if you think its a
> good idea to use, that's your prerogative. I just think you should use
> liberapay for the majority of your donations. and avoid bitcoin when
the other difference here is - was (before i had enough information
to be able to ascertain that it was not feasible to do so):
* when i believed that bitclub was a high-exponential curve payout
*I* intended *TO FUND* software libre projects with it
* now that i *KNOW* that bitclub is a LONG TERM investment, i am back
- once again - to being DEPENDENT on donations and sponsorship and,
once a fucking gain getting money from contract work and/or having to
consider enslavement i mean employment which i know that people will
say "you're wasting your time, you're a threat to our jobs".
door number one: financially independent and able to fund all
projects i ever wanted to fund
door number two: not financially independent and back to having to
listen to people telling me i'm being a fucking idiot and incapable of
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk
More information about the arm-netbook