[Arm-netbook] Huge RAM requirements (was: What do 1, 000 EOMA68-A20 PCBs look like?)

zap calmstorm at posteo.de
Sun Dec 9 21:30:43 GMT 2018

On 12/09/2018 12:07 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:54 PM zap <calmstorm at posteo.de> wrote:
>> Any plans to use rk3399 for a 2nd revision of the eoma68 standard? or
>> any alternative arm processor? Since risc-v is maybe 3+ years out of the
>> way?
>  yes.  bear in mind it's around USD $5k-10k per design effort.  i
> *may* be able to recover the RK3288 PCB i did.  the RK3399 would be
> nicer.
My bad for responding to you directly and now too, but yeah, I think
RK3399 would be better for meltdown spectre protection, etc...

Also, it is faster :)

> l.
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk

More information about the arm-netbook mailing list