[Arm-netbook] Well, /this/ looks relevant...
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Fri Oct 6 01:32:02 BST 2017
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 7:38 PM, zap <calmstorm at posteo.de> wrote:
>> there's no reason - at all - why they would put or require any
>> proprietary firmware on it. there's no VPU, no GPU, nothing special
>> at all. the nice thing is it looks like it'll be actual first silicon
>> 64-bit so people can at last start doing native compiles. that's
>> particularly important for debian: cross-compiled or qemu-compiled
> Well, if you are certain then... I guess it is important.
>> packages are *not* accepted (arch they don't mind).
> I am curious why arch is different then debian...
smaller team, less well-established, rolling releases. debian's
strict rules, established and tested over 20+ years now, means it can
be trusted for critical infrastructure.
l.
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list