[Arm-netbook] EOMA68-A20 interface redesign

[Paul NeoStormer]

> no, because the A20, which is being used in this first EOMA68-compliant
CPU Card, does not have USB3.

I understand the A20 doesn't have USB3, but does that mean all EOMA-68
cards cannot have USB3?
I have USB3 devices that default to USB2 speeds when the device isn't
equipped with USB3, but I think USB3 requires 5 extra pins.

> EOMA-68 is an interface standard, not a computer.  i assume you mean the
EOMA68-A20 CPU Card.

Yes, but I suppose it would also give the standard a good chance if the
first card out has decent specs.


On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net
> wrote:

> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Paul NeoStormer
> <paulneostormer at gmail.com> wrote:
> > So they'll be 3 USB outputs on the card in total?
>
>  yes.  2 USB2 480mbit/sec, 1 USB-OTG, also 480mbdit/sec
>
> > I imagine the one that was
> > added will be USB 3.0.
>
>  no, because the A20, which is being used in this first
> EOMA68-compliant CPU Card, does not have USB3.
>
> > Are the USB's just a pinout? no extra hardware other than adding a port?
>
>  correct.
>
> > OTG?
>
>  yes.
>
> > 2GB of RAM sounds great! Should give the EOMA-68 a good running chance.
>
>  EOMA-68 is an interface standard, not a computer.  i assume you mean
> the EOMA68-A20 CPU Card.
>
> l.
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/attachments/20140530/89520e73/attachment.html>