[Arm-netbook] EOMA - Open Specification?

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:50 AM, peter green <plugwash at p10link.net> wrote:

> However if something is to be considered an open standard you have to accept
> and allow people who meet the technical requirements to implement it and
> sell there own implmentations it *even if* you don't like them and *even if*
> you have had a past collaboration with them go bad due to miscommunication.

ok - i see the point you're making.  well, i am not disagreeing with
you.  i will have to think about it.  my initial reaction is to go
"ambivalent / neutral" as in "not take any action that need not be
considered".

 guys - can we bring this discussion to a close now?  as you know i
have been forced to take a contract in a foreign country in order to
get some funds in: that means i am incredibly busy and do not really
have the time for long discussions.

l.