[Arm-netbook] [router] schematics started

[Derek LaHousse]

luke.leighton <luke.leighton <at> gmail.com> writes:

> it does have to be an equivalent,
> _and_ one that doesn't require an NDA, _and_ is still current, _and_
> isn't going end-of-life any time soon, _and_ is fully integrated with
> direct UTP driving  <at>  gigabit speeds without needing one extra PHY IC
> per interface.

Which of these did the Qualcomm chip I posted fall into?  NDA?  Or because
it had too many ports?