[Arm-netbook] PengPod spam based on this list?

[luke.leighton]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Brendan Sleight <bms.debian at barwap.com> wrote:

> Assuming this is the case. It is a shame, PengPod looks good and have
> the right approach.

 yes.

> I am assuming a genuine mistake some how. No harm
> done, a few bits extra bits wasted.  (*Cough* -
> http://www.spi-inc.org/donations/ )

 *lol*.

> Regards,
> Brendan
>
>
> To: <bms.debian at barwap.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:41:43 +0000
> Message-ID: <2b746d7630e1e476f1aefec106ff0e209bb.20130911214133 at mail95.us4.mcsv.net>
> X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID1dc3ce146b6ff0e209bb**
> X-Campaign: mailchimp2b746d7630e1e476f1aefec10.1dc3ce146b
> X-campaignid: mailchimp2b746d7630e1e476f1aefec10.1dc3ce146b
> X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here:
> http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=2b746d7630e1e476f1aefec10&id=1dc3ce146b&e=6ff0e209bb

 ok - that's an "abuse reporting" link.  can i recommend to people
that if they've received a message which is clearly direct, to click
on that link?

 i've contacted neal to ask him what's going on.

l.