[Arm-netbook] RGB/TTL interface selection, why in EOMA-68

[luke.leighton]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Henrik Nordström <
henrik at henriknordstrom.net> wrote:

> tor 2012-11-29 klockan 12:11 -0500 skrev Scott Sullivan:
>
> > This is all ignoring the fact that the spec has been published and
> > available for a year.
>
> And critisied for the choice of TTL from start, but partly silenced by
> the response that EOMA MAY be revised in future to use LVDS.
>
>
 EOMA-CF uses LVDS, because of the much-restricted number of pins.  we'll
just have to live with the reduced number of SoCs that will have LVDS
on-board (if anyone manages to get 2 DRAMs, a SoC, NAND Flash *and* an LVDS
converter IC *and* PMICs *and* Ethernet PHY onto a 35x30mm PCB i'll fall
off my chair)

 EOMA-68 is intended to be much more diverse: whatever it takes, we make it
work.

l.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/attachments/20121130/933683df/attachment.html