<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Henrik Nordström <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:henrik@henriknordstrom.net" target="_blank">henrik@henriknordstrom.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex">
tor 2012-11-29 klockan 12:11 -0500 skrev Scott Sullivan:<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> This is all ignoring the fact that the spec has been published and<br>
> available for a year.<br>
<br>
</div>And critisied for the choice of TTL from start, but partly silenced by<br>
the response that EOMA MAY be revised in future to use LVDS.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br> EOMA-CF uses LVDS, because of the much-restricted number of pins. we'll just have to live with the reduced number of SoCs that will have LVDS on-board (if anyone manages to get 2 DRAMs, a SoC, NAND Flash *and* an LVDS converter IC *and* PMICs *and* Ethernet PHY onto a 35x30mm PCB i'll fall off my chair)<br>
<br> EOMA-68 is intended to be much more diverse: whatever it takes, we make it work.<br><br>l.<br></div></div>