[Arm-netbook] Another chip to consider for a future EOMA product

[Derek]

Scott Sullivan <scott <at> ss.org> writes:

> At 400Mhz, it was a low value proposition to begin with.
> 

Well, let us note that those are x86 clocks, not ARMv6 clocks.  Not that I
claim to know how much work this Quark is doing per clock, but certainly a
Core 2 running at 700 MHz would lap a RasPi.

Now, if it doesn't get that same work done, then what is Intel thinking?