-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but Intel's at it again: https://www.anandtech.com/show/14467/intel-launches-the-nuc-compute-element-...
Yes, I already commented. Oddly, for the first time in my life on AT, I had to actually re-write my comment because the system thought it was spam. So luke, I'm your personal spam bot. ;)
David
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:18 PM David Niklas doark@mail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but Intel's at it again: https://www.anandtech.com/show/14467/intel-launches-the-nuc-compute-element-...
oh look, it's EOMA200!
On Monday 3. June 2019 20.59.11 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:18 PM David Niklas doark@mail.com wrote:
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but Intel's at it again: https://www.anandtech.com/show/14467/intel-launches-the-nuc-compute-element-...
A few people in the article's comments are already unhappy about it, having had to abandon their investment in Intel's last initiative.
oh look, it's EOMA200!
Reminds me of Olimex's SOM204. Must be three times better than EOMA68:
https://www.olimex.com/Products/SOM204/
Paul
P.S. Any news on the production front?
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 10:10 PM Paul Boddie paul@boddie.org.uk wrote:
Reminds me of Olimex's SOM204. Must be three times better than EOMA68:
standards need to be properly designed, otherwise they're not standards.
Paul
P.S. Any news on the production front?
mike's manager's quit, and the production knowledge which we learned and accumulated through the samples has gone with him.
mike and i need to re-learn and recall the information.
l.
P.S. Any news on the production front?
mike's manager's quit, and the production knowledge which we learned and accumulated through the samples has gone with him.
mike and i need to re-learn and recall the information.
l.
Rough, hope you can do this without anymore foul ups. Not saying its your fault either...
as I said though, Don't give up!
:)
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk
On 9 June 2019 17:38:55 GMT-04:00, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 10:10 PM Paul Boddie paul@boddie.org.uk wrote:
Paul
P.S. Any news on the production front?
mike's manager's quit, and the production knowledge which we learned and accumulated through the samples has gone with him.
mike and i need to re-learn and recall the information.
Damn Luke, EOMA68 really can't catch a break can it.
l.
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 10:52 PM Adam Van Ymeren adam@vany.ca wrote:
mike's manager's quit, and the production knowledge which we learned and accumulated through the samples has gone with him.
mike and i need to re-learn and recall the information.
Damn Luke, EOMA68 really can't catch a break can it.
if we had USD $1m - $2m in funding or it was part of a Corporation that had a large R&D budget, it would have been completed well over 3-4 years ago.
success is achieved by solving the issues that come up one at a time *until* the goal (success) is met.
not any other way. success doesn't happen by sitting back and hoping (or complaining)!
l.
On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 22:57:57 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 10:52 PM Adam Van Ymeren adam@vany.ca wrote:
mike's manager's quit, and the production knowledge which we learned and accumulated through the samples has gone with him.
mike and i need to re-learn and recall the information.
D*** Luke, EOMA68 really can't catch a break can it.
If we had USD $1m - $2m in funding or it was part of a Corporation that had a large R&D budget, it would have been completed well over 3-4 years ago.
Success is achieved by solving the issues that come up one at a time *until* the goal (success) is met.
Not any other way. success doesn't happen by sitting back and hoping (or complaining)!
l.
And in our next episode: luke gets hit by lightening and the eoma68 gets to be completed by his daughter, a girl with a taste for pink PCBs and huge yellow heatsinks with stickers! ;-)
Trying to cheer you up a little, David
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:11 AM David Niklas doark@mail.com wrote:
And in our next episode: luke gets hit by lightening and the eoma68 gets to be completed by his daughter, a girl with a taste for pink PCBs and huge yellow heatsinks with stickers! ;-)
:) actually it would likely be bright blue (her favourite colour), and the standard would make installation of Roblox and Minecraft mandatory... *sigh* :)
l.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 7:54 PM Jean Flamelle eaterjolly@gmail.com wrote:
Minecraft
oooo, that's really nice! we also tried minetest.
l.
On Sunday 9. June 2019 22.38.55 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 10:10 PM Paul Boddie paul@boddie.org.uk wrote:
Reminds me of Olimex's SOM204. Must be three times better than EOMA68:
standards need to be properly designed, otherwise they're not standards.
I think there's quite a bit of optional stuff in those 204 connections, arguably making it a bit like a breakout board for SoCs. That might be helpful for some applications, but probably isn't what one might call "plug and play".
P.S. Any news on the production front?
mike's manager's quit, and the production knowledge which we learned and accumulated through the samples has gone with him.
mike and i need to re-learn and recall the information.
That is unfortunate news. I hope you can both figure things out without too much effort and inconvenience.
Paul
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 11:00 PM Paul Boddie paul@boddie.org.uk wrote:
On Sunday 9. June 2019 22.38.55 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 10:10 PM Paul Boddie paul@boddie.org.uk wrote:
Reminds me of Olimex's SOM204. Must be three times better than EOMA68:
standards need to be properly designed, otherwise they're not standards.
I think there's quite a bit of optional stuff in those 204 connections,
it's dead, then. anything that's made optional, you're screwed for compatibility, right from the start. how can you possibly make a base-board and hope to have any chance of upgrading the SOM in the future, if the future SOMs have "options" that are completely and utterly missing, and yet are absolutely essential for the correct functioning of the base-board??
stupid.
arguably making it a bit like a breakout board for SoCs. That might be helpful for some applications, but probably isn't what one might call "plug and play".
EOMA200 was very carefully designed from lessons learned from the standards that Intel has been involved in. COMExpress, PC-104 and so on.
both of those are unnnbelievably well-designed standards. PC-104 has been incredibly successful: look at how long it's been around. over 25 years?
l.
P.S. Any news on the production front?
mike's manager's quit, and the production knowledge which we learned and accumulated through the samples has gone with him.
mike and i need to re-learn and recall the information.
That is unfortunate news. I hope you can both figure things out without too much effort and inconvenience.
Paul
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk
arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
-
Adam Van Ymeren -
David Niklas -
Jean Flamelle -
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton -
Paul Boddie -
zap