Yea that's what I meant, sorry my bad. My question is, what physical form factor will the EOMA 200 cards have( that is, what will "house" the electronics) ?

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Bill Kontos <vkontogpls@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh ok so do you have any draft idea what kind of housing the eoma 68
> standard will utilize ?

 good question, easily answered (in perhaps a perplexing answer,
apologies) - anything that people wish to envisage.  it's not down to
me (or the standard) to *restrict* people on what kind of housings are
created, in fact the total opposite is the case (hence why i am
creating reference designs).  btw "Housing" has a special meaning in
EOMA68 terminology, where's that glossary, can anyone remember? :)

 now i think about it, you *might* have used the word "housing"
without it being specifically in EOMA68 terminology - in which case
you *might* be referring to PCMCIA Type I, II and III sockets.  it
*is* necessary to comply with the *PHYSICAL* sizes of the PCMCIA
sockets and *PHYSICAL* PCMCIA card dimensions.

l.

_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk