On 07/26/14 08:07, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Simon Kenyon simon@koala.ie wrote:
On 07/25/14 20:33, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Miguel Garcia gacuest@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen that you have removed LCD Pixel Data bit 0, LCD Pixel Data bit 1, LCD Pixel Data bit 8, LCD Pixel Data bit 9, LCD Pixel Data bit 16 and LCD Pixel Data bit 17. Does this have any effect on the LCD? honestly, not a lot. if it was only 5 bits per pixel then yes it would start to be clearly visible as 5 bpp is only 32 shades. 6 bits is 64 shades per colour.
grabbing wrong end of stick
i though EOMA-68 was a standard that was not going to change?
the standard is a long-term standard that cannot be changed once the first product in the range is launched. as the first product hasn't been launched, i have the advantage and benefit of more time to think "what would a long-term standard have in it?"
also because i am now working right now with *three* CPU Cards and two base units simultaneously i have the advantage of being able to think how to cover as many possibilities as can be done.
the IC1T has only 210 pins for example, yet the revisions made recently *still* allow that IC to be within the standard.
l.
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk
in that case:
- remove all connectors from the end of the card - add as much ram as you can and double it