2017-06-21 13:00 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net:
.On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:35 AM, mike.valk@gmail.com mike.valk@gmail.com wrote:
2017-06-17 11:17 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl@lkcl.net:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:40 PM, mike.valk@gmail.com mike.valk@gmail.com wrote:
i knoow... btw can you possibly investigate why, when you hit "reply", the ">"s are not added?
I was using gmail in HTML mode, apparently. I've found a switch. Hopefully this works better.
it does. yay!
For those wonder how. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDP3VcmsYtg
in a stack you tell the factory what thicknesses you want, as well as what material in between, and what thickness of that, too. so you get
So it doesn't have to be a problem. As long as you control the layers that have traces have the same thicknesses.
technically correct but far too much risk and hassle. you end up tying the PCB layout to a specific PCB manufacturing factory.
Hmm. If only we could include parameterised sections in the design to accommodate that.
l.
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk