Ultimately, isolation of the sim card or otherwise modem, should probably be the biggest concern. There are ethical concerns around artificial scarcity from telephone numbers and, to be fair, ipv4 addresses, (metaphorical mints thereof having absolute decision-making authority giving infinite leverage as "benevolent dictators" who can simply crash everything if something doesn't go their way) that should be considered before dedicating too much priority to this task.
A more perfect solution (longterm) would be a network with self-modulating scarcity of addresses, in a fashion reminiscent of bitcoin. However it would be prudent to construct a language the anti-thesis of esoteric (top-down, expressing this anti-thesis on all levels of design) to describe the underlining software in and make the networking protocol more accepting of contrarian behavior.
If this sounds like a lot, consider that for a person with no experience computer design, it should be easier to learn as they go when designing this, than to pick up all the computer design wisdom necessary to retrofit or "reverse-engineer" literally self-described as esoteric systems. Is there not a fundament to computers, computer design, and network engineering, that is intuitive to beings not fortunate enough to be included in the circles of any so-called esotericism of any kind?
I apologize if my reliance on certain obscure terms, without interchanging any alternative phrasings made this email seem convoluted and difficult to understand.
On 4/16/17, GaCuest gacuest@gmail.com wrote:
El 16 de abril de 2017 a las 12:42:43, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl@lkcl.net) escribió:
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, GaCuest wrote:
El 14 de abril de 2017 a las 7:37:24, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton (lkcl@lkcl.net) escribió:
the idea there is to use an LCD that has *dual* control interfaces: SPI *AND* RGB/TTL.
Something like this?: http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/shenzen/frida/FRD3504503.pdf
... exactly like that :) except i'm not a huge fan of resistive panels... they are quite a lot cheaper though.
Yes, it was an example, I prefer CTP :)
I think the idea that a cell phone can work without EOMA68 (for basic functions) is a very good idea, but is it difficult to do? I want to say because you have to do many things 2 times to be able to work with EOMA68 and without EOMA68.
On the other hand, is the STM32F072 capable of handling the audio with good quality?
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk