Gonna have to agree, logo should work in black and white
On January 30, 2017 4:50:35 PM GMT+03:00, Alain Williams addw@phcomp.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:33:46AM -0500, Julie Marchant wrote:
On 01/30/2017 05:25 AM, Alain Williams wrote:
Unfortunately that is not good enough ... you are assuming that
people will use
the monchrome version of the logo rather than just photocopying the
colour one
on a monochrome copyier.
You can easily prevent that with a trademark policy... and why would someone choose to make their own half-baked monochrome conversion
when a
proper one is available?
Because they have a piece of paper about whatever and the logo happens to be on there. Producing a new document is too much effort, they just photocopy it for whatever purpose.
Many people just do the minimum to do what they have to, they won't care at all about some logo of something that they might not even understand.
-- Alain Williams Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer. +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php #include <std_disclaimer.h>
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netbook@files.phcomp.co.uk