[Arm-netbook] Testing: GPIO
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Sat Mar 3 20:11:27 GMT 2018
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Pablo Rath <pablo at parobalth.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 03:46:33AM +0000, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 2:44 AM, Jonathan Neuschäfer
>> <j.neuschaefer at gmx.net> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> > About DT fragments: I'm not sure what you mean exactly. Mainline support
>> > devicetree overlays which should do (half of) the job for EOMA68, though.
>>
>> ah, yes, that's the official name. overlays.
>>
>> question: do you know if they've added the patches to *REMOVE*
>> overlays yet? Cards could potentially be dynamically removed... or at
>> least put into sleep / suspend only to wake up with a totally
>> different Housing.
>
> The whole DT overlay discussion rang a bell somewhere in my brain and
> now I had time to look it up. I read about a DT overlay hack here:
> https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/easy-peasy-devicetree-squeezy/
> Please read the README for details.
> Can the above hack be of some use to the EOMA project until "patches to
> fully support overlays, including loading them on the fly into a running
> system" are mainlined?
as long as people are happy to have the linux kernel source tarball
on their system... yes.
and they are happy not to have 100% working hardware.
> It seems we are not the only one with DT overlay problems:
> https://elinux.org/BeagleBone_and_the_3.8_Kernel#Cape_Manager_and_Device_Tree_Overlays
yyup. and they don't have the dynamic removal.
l.
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list