richard.wilbur at gmail.com
Tue Jul 10 22:11:12 BST 2018
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 13:37, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
> interestingly the bullet-points 3 and 5 are *actuallly
> legitimate concerns*. the RISC-V Foundation is over-controlled by UCB
> Berkeley, via a structure that is similar to the failed Google Project
> Ara ("it's open as long as you sign our secret agreement and don't
> publish information we don't want you to").
Are you referring to "Design Assurance"(as 3) and "Security"(as 5)?
Seems like an advertisement specifically against risc-v by and for ARM.
I'm sorry to hear about those terms on a project with any pretensions of being "open".
 UCB stands for "University of California at Berkeley" so the intermediate form is normally "UC Berkeley".
More information about the arm-netbook