[Arm-netbook] Logos

[John Luke Gibson]

I'm not entirely sure why resolution should be relevant. Something
without small defining characteristics that are unclear or illegible
when the resolution is low might be desire-able, but I would assume so
long as any is still atleast 10 pt font when shrunk to 3cm on its
widest dimension, it should be sufficient.

On 3/18/17, Alain Williams <addw at phcomp.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 03:14:11PM -0700, Mike Leimon wrote:
>
>> http://i.imgur.com/jjUbFx5.png
>
>> ...
>
>> Oh and I have one more general comment about logo creation of this sort...
>> I think that
>> it is very important to make sure it will look good rendered in only black
>> and white because,
>> that is essentially what it is going to look like when the
>> logo/certification mark gets
>> silk-screened onto a product.
>
> And also low resolution especially when scaled so that it is really small -
> eg
> the side of some box. This is my objection to the top of the two logos that
> you have.
>
>
> --
> Alain Williams
> Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
> Lecturer.
> +44 (0) 787 668 0256  http://www.phcomp.co.uk/
> Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information:
> http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php
> #include <std_disclaimer.h>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk