[Arm-netbook] Standards Organization as a Potentially Universal Free/Libre Software Developement Sustenance Model

[zap]

>  liked some, didn't like others.  "etiquette guidelines" doesn't have
> the same toxic punch as "code of conduct" is well-known for.  liked
> the idea of including the VCS and if it's libre-hosted (likewise for
> bugtracker) but *not* the wording you chose ("self-hosted").
> self-hosted could mean "proprietary and therefore unethical" and
> people would put "yeah it's GR8 maaan!" so i changed it back
> *specifically* to "is it libre hosted yes or no" because that's really
> important.
>
>  basically we're collating info - evidence - that ethical (or
> unethical) practices support a project's lifecycle... and other
> obseervations.  what practices make a project both ethical *and*
> long-term successful.
>
>  also i turned the table round by 90 degrees as i could see it getting
> far too long, and then broke them down into related groups.  still
> some TODO.b
>
>  l.

I think any distro that is at devuan standards or better should be on
the list.

I would have said debian standard, but, I thought you might want me to
stay clear of that... so yeah...

as for repositories for hosting libre packages, notabug and gogs are
good ones.