[Arm-netbook] Question about resolution on the micro-desktop

[Julie Marchant]

On 01/13/2017 12:30 PM, dumblob wrote:
> Also, if all the housings must support the rates of 1366x768, then I
> would say it's too much.

I think it's obvious that's not what the standard says. It says that the
*card* must support 1366x768. That's very different from requiring the
*display* to support 1366x768. The only thing the display is required to
do is support a resolution within the range the cards are required to
support, so you can't have a type II housing that is only capable of
displaying at 1920x1080. But having a type II housing that is only
capable of displaying at 800x480 would be perfectly fine.


-- 
Julie Marchant
https://onpon4.github.io

Protect your emails with GnuPG:
https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/attachments/20170113/f166199a/attachment-0001.sig>