[Arm-netbook] Intel at CES

[Jonathan Frederickson]

It's a shame that none of the previous EOMA-68 devices got off the
ground before Intel pulled this out - "hey this already exists"
would've been a serious advantage for EOMA-68 as a standard.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Jonathan Frederickson
<silverskullpsu at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> <lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
>>  which are, in your opinion, the "right set of interfaces"?  serious
>> question.  if you're going to make such comments, you'd better be
>> prepared to back them up and be prepared to justify them with a
>> *REALLY* thorough analysis.
>
> I think all he meant was that Intel can pick whatever interfaces they
> want for the standard that they think will be relatively future-proof.
> They don't have to worry about finding SoCs with those interfaces,
> because they manufacture the SoCs - they just have to decide on them
> at the start.