[Arm-netbook] ZeroPhone

[Adam Van Ymeren]

Why do you want artificial scarcity of addresses?  Either via bitcoin type system or some authority I don't see any benefit to artificial address scarcity.


  Original Message  
From: eaterjolly at gmail.com
Sent: April 16, 2017 8:45 PM
To: arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
Reply-to: arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] ZeroPhone

Ultimately, isolation of the sim card or otherwise modem, should
probably be the biggest concern. There are ethical concerns around
artificial scarcity from telephone numbers and, to be fair, ipv4
addresses, (metaphorical mints thereof having absolute decision-making
authority giving infinite leverage as "benevolent dictators" who can
simply crash everything if something doesn't go their way) that should
be considered before dedicating too much priority to this task.

A more perfect solution (longterm) would be a network with
self-modulating scarcity of addresses, in a fashion reminiscent of


bitcoin. However it would be prudent to construct a language the
anti-thesis of esoteric (top-down, expressing this anti-thesis on all
levels of design) to describe the underlining software in and make the
networking protocol more accepting of contrarian behavior.

If this sounds like a lot, consider that for a person with no
experience computer design, it should be easier to learn as they go
when designing this, than to pick up all the computer design wisdom
necessary to retrofit or "reverse-engineer" literally self-described
as esoteric systems. Is there not a fundament to computers, computer
design, and network engineering, that is intuitive to beings not
fortunate enough to be included in the circles of any so-called
esotericism of any kind?

I apologize if my reliance on certain obscure terms, without
interchanging any alternative phrasings made this email seem
convoluted and difficult to understand.

On 4/16/17, GaCuest <gacuest at gmail.com> wrote:
> El 16 de abril de 2017 a las 12:42:43, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> (lkcl at lkcl.net) escribió:
>> ---
>> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, GaCuest wrote:
>> > El 14 de abril de 2017 a las 7:37:24, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
>> > (lkcl at lkcl.net) escribió:
>> >> the idea there is to use an LCD that has *dual* control interfaces:
>> >> SPI *AND* RGB/TTL.
>> >
>> > Something like this?:
>> > http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/shenzen/frida/FRD3504503.pdf
>>
>> ... exactly like that :) except i'm not a huge fan of resistive
>> panels... they are quite a lot cheaper though.
>>
>
> Yes, it was an example, I prefer CTP :)
>
> I think the idea that a cell phone can work without EOMA68
>  (for basic functions) is a very good idea, but is it difficult to do?
> I want to say because you have to do many things 2 times to
> be able to work with EOMA68 and without EOMA68.
>
> On the other hand, is the STM32F072 capable of handling
> the audio with good quality?
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk

_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk