[Arm-netbook] EOMA-68 or EOMA68? How to write name?

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at lkcl.net
Tue Sep 6 22:42:06 BST 2016


---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68


On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Alexander .S.T. Ross
<maillist_arm-netbook at aross.me> wrote:
> I’m not sure anymore. how are you supposed to write eoma-68? with or
> without the dash "-"?

 without, otherwise when we do "EOMA-68-A20" it doesn't make sense.

> Could you clarify how the name is written, on the elinux wiki page please.

 good idea.

> could it also be unofficial or official, as to weather for referring to
> all/any eoma standard if the notation of eoma*/eoma-* counts/is
> permitted/ok?

 yeahh if using the convention of naming computer cards
"standard-processortype" then adding in an extra "-" results in huge
confusion.


> cus ive been using it as a young cool shorthand :). reminds me of
> diaspora*/D* and how they use the wildcard in there logo.
> if its not ok, then ill stop and use "a eoma standard" instead.

 EOMA68 one word.  other standards come later.

l.



More information about the arm-netbook mailing list