[Arm-netbook] Wikipedia article

[Vincent Legoll]

And after having read some of the heat the project got on forums & mls
we should be careful with the terms used to describe the "libreness"
of it or it could degenerate quickly into an wikipedia editing war...

Just my 2cents

On 8/27/16, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> wrote:
> ---
> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Muhammed Adel Afzal <adel at ncf.ca> wrote:
>> Is "libre" better defined, and a better match, for EOMA-68?  Better than
>> "open" standard, I mean.  Genuine question .. I have no idea.
>>
>> Wiki says "open" right now.
>
>  i know... it doesn't say "open source" though :)
>
>  honestly, i don't know.  "libre" has a specific connotation that
> requires that the "four freedoms" be applied to it.  i honestly
> haven't evaluated that yet.
>
> l.
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk


-- 
Vincent Legoll