[Arm-netbook] Resource for quantifying the relative performance of the A20
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Mon Aug 15 20:31:37 BST 2016
---
crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:16 PM, Russell Hyer <russell.hyer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I don't think the issue right now is whether or how it compares
> with other chips (we have other chips already). Of course, if it's
> libre competition, that's also for the good. I guess Intel peeps could
> be redirected to https://puri.sm/
>
> (You can check their website as they are also trying towards RYF certified, see:
>
> https://puri.sm/road-to-fsf-ryf-endorsement-and-beyond/
ohhh jaezus not again. *sigh* well at least they're trying with this:
https://puri.sm/posts/petition-for-intel-to-release-an-me-less-cpu-design/
what's pissing people off is that they're claiming *right now* to be
"libre" when in fact they are absolutely flat-out *NOT*. you can't
use the word "libre" - via the name "librem" and still require a
proprietary piece of firmware that runs on an NSA spyware-friendly
backdoor co-processor.
if they wanted people to trust them they should have put their foot
down and said NO, we will NOT EVEN SELL a product that has a backdoor
privacy-violating co-processor and attempt to label it "libre".
l.
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list