[Arm-netbook] EOMA68-IC1t successful board bring-up
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Thu Oct 16 20:55:12 BST 2014
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
<manuel.montezelo at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-10-15 00:27 Wookey:
>>
>> +++ Philip Hands [2014-10-14 21:54 +0100]:
>>>
>>> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> writes:
>>>
>>> > *lol* no. i'm making some enquiries on how to do a debian port.
>>>
>>> Look here: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBootstrap
>>
>>
>> As I just come to the end of the 2-4 year (depending what you count)
>> arm64 port, I can confirm that there is some expertise on this list on
>> how to do new debian ports.
>>
>> #debian-bootstrap is the IRC channel to use for questions
>
>
> I am helping with OpenRISC or1k in particular, but also helped a bit
> modifying packages which benefited all of the Debian ports added lately
> (arm64, ppc64el, mips64el and or1k). I can probably lend a hand in an
> effort to get a Debian port of this new architecture, but of course
> people like Wookey have much more experience than me.
>
> A difficult part that I see is if GCC cannot generate code for this
> architecture. I think that many packages expect to be compiled in GCC,
> and if they are libraries or important pieces of infrastructure, they
> will block packages depending on them. Even if it's a tiny percentage,
> there are more than 10K source packages in Debian nowadays, so it's not
> a minor task.
there's always a way round that: a package that "pretends" it is gcc
(i think it is something like "Provides")
> risc-v/lowrisc could also be an interesting project,
yeees... my only reservation is that they have a golden opportunity
to create something that's actually commercially desirable.... and
they are probably instead going to create something that is only of
interest to academia.
l.
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list