[Arm-netbook] EOMA - Open Specification?

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Boris Barbour <barbour at biologie.ens.fr> wrote:
>
> That's a good point, Jonathan.
>
>
> On 25/05/14 16:49, Jonathan Frederickson wrote:
>>
>> I can understand being blacklisted as a customer, and removing all
>> mention of EOMA
>
>
> Actually, I would hope (and believe) that any properly compliant
> implementation (open drivers!) would be able to use the EOMA name/trademark.

 if they're properly compliant, of course!  we do not wish to have the
EOMA name brought into disrepute by people getting it wrong
(deliberately *or* accidentally).

l.