[Arm-netbook] DTB for eoma-a20 pc?
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at lkcl.net
Fri Jun 27 16:58:12 BST 2014
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Wookey <wookey at wookware.org> wrote:
> +++ Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [2014-06-27 15:03 +0100]:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Stefan Monnier
>> <monnier at iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> >> it actually needs dynamic creation based on:
>> >> * a "base" DTB
>> >> * kernel-time detection of the I2C EEPROM
>> >> * reading of a board-specific DTB file from the I2C EEPROM
>> >> * merging of the "base" DTB with the board-specific DTB.
>> >
>> > The two middle points could be done by u-boot, since u-boot already
>> > adjusts the kernel's dtb in many cases (e.g. to provide the amount of
>> > RAM available).
>>
>> ah! good point. and... wait... hang on... *thinks*.... there are
>> circumstances where suspend, unplug, resume...
>>
>> ... no, it really does have to be handled by the kernel - hopefully
>> u-boot would not need to do much (if anything).
>>
>> ok, first suggestion: wookie,
>
> wookey - you should know by now :-)
doh!
>> would you be happy to do the "base"
>> DTB, basically set up a DTB which is in effect booting the CPU Card
>> from USB-OTG, with UART, USB, Ethernet and RGB/TTL LCD enabled?
>> ignore GPIO (they can change).
>
> Yes, I'll try to make a DTB that boots my card in my holder. Once
> that's working we can look at what a more complete solution looks like.
awesome.
> How many DTB-different holders are actually available currently?
pffh. one, with 5 needing funding to turn into real products within
6 weeks, and another... 20 planned.
> And what should we call the DTB file(s)?
argh think eoma68-a20-base. that makes it clear that it's not the "full" DTB.
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list