[Arm-netbook] http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA-68#Table_of_EOMA-68_pinouts

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at lkcl.net
Sat Jul 26 08:07:44 BST 2014


On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Simon Kenyon <simon at koala.ie> wrote:
> On 07/25/14 20:33, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Miguel Garcia <gacuest at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have seen that you have removed LCD Pixel Data bit 0, LCD Pixel Data
>> bit 1, LCD Pixel Data bit 8, LCD Pixel Data bit 9, LCD Pixel Data bit
>> 16 and LCD Pixel Data bit 17. Does this have any effect on the LCD?
>>   honestly, not a lot.  if it was only 5 bits per pixel then yes it
>> would start to be clearly visible as 5 bpp is only 32 shades.  6 bits
>> is 64 shades per colour.
>
> grabbing wrong end of stick
>
> i though EOMA-68 was a standard that was not going to change?

 the standard is a long-term standard that cannot be changed once the
first product in the range is launched.  as the first product hasn't
been launched, i have the advantage and benefit of more time to think
"what would a long-term standard have in it?"

 also because i am now working right now with *three* CPU Cards and
two base units simultaneously i have the advantage of being able to
think how to cover as many possibilities as can be done.

 the IC1T has only 210 pins for example, yet the revisions made
recently *still* allow that IC to be within the standard.

l.



More information about the arm-netbook mailing list