[Arm-netbook] EOMA micro SD card boot image (alpha quality) with sata working available

[luke.leighton]

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 2:20 PM, joem <joem at martindale-electric.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 12:24 +0000, Derek wrote:
>> joem <joem <at> martindale-electric.co.uk> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 10:39 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> > > magic, joe, i see you've cut/paste it into the page.  bear in mind
>> > > that you're now distributing GPL binaries so *may* receive requests
>> >
>> > $$$ krching!! $$$
>> >
>> > Bring it on I say if its a GPL compliant request.
>> > I charge $90 per hour of work to download and package the sources
>> > and put onto dvds and send (+p&p + taxes + cost of DVDs + I supply
>> > one sweet FREE as in gratis with every shipment!!)
>> >
>>
>> " If you distribute binaries by download, you must provide “equivalent
>> access” to download the source—therefore, the fee to download source may not
>> be greater than the fee to download the binary."
>>
>> from
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowDownloadFee
>
>
> Redundant.
>
>
> "Equivalent access" is already given by pointing at the sources where it
> can be downloaded for free.

 ok, so this is another primary reason why i have been pushing that
you get up-to-speed on how to build these things, because you're
required to provide [an equivalent for] the *exact* same source and
tools.

 if you don't *know* how the kernel etc. were built, because you did
not successfully replicate it, that is no excuse, and you would be
required to cease and desist distribution.

 merely pointing at the config file and saying "if you do this
yourself you might have better luck than i had" would in no way be
adequate.

l.