[Arm-netbook] apologies

luke.leighton luke.leighton at gmail.com
Tue Nov 12 12:09:52 GMT 2013


On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Christopher Havel
<laserhawk64 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/10/2013 9:08 PM, luke.leighton wrote:
>>
>> apologies to everyone on the list - you may have noticed i'm using
>> brief and curt language at the moment.  it's not personal: i just have
>> far less time available and have to be very focussed.
>> l.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
>> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk
>
> Sorry to hear you're so busy. Can I help? :D

 yes.  i thought of something.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm/7597

 could you investigate, find some "educational" style electronics
explanations online, as to why henrik's recommendation to use a
pull-up resistor to 3.3V and a reversed-diode between the Tx UART and
incoming Rx actually works?  i'm attaching a small diagram showing the
circuit.

 it can then be added here:
http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA-68#Requirements_for_UART

 also i think.... to avoid too big a voltage-drop it should be a zener
diode otherwise it might interfere with the thresholds.

  basically i think the way it works is that 0 logic level on UART is
"positive voltage", and the Tx line "sucks" current down to GND in
order to indicate a "1".  therefore, normally (i.e. without the diode)
current would be flowing *from* Rx *to* Tx if Tx is held at GND to
indicate a "1"... so putting the diode in the circuit is... well...
normal!

l.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: uart_protect.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2449 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/attachments/20131112/1cf5e997/attachment.png>


More information about the arm-netbook mailing list