[Arm-netbook] upstreaming the fex for the eoma

[Marco Martin]

On Monday 16 December 2013, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> ... put [deliberately] like that, it's not really a choice... :)
> 
> i realise however that you need something to work with in the
> short-term.  you are free to do that, but if you want to submit an
> "upstream" fex file, you are free to call it whatever you wish as long
> as it does not have the words "eoma" or "eoma68" in it.  i trust that
> this is clear.

ok..

right now i'm packaging an eoma68 fex as part of a clone repository (so not 
upstreamed yet)

is this ok?

or i can do a different separated package with it with a different name

Cheers,
Marco Martin