[Arm-netbook] origen 4 (exynos S5PV310)
Derek LaHousse
dlahouss at mtu.edu
Sun Sep 16 20:22:57 BST 2012
On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 19:57 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Derek LaHousse <dlahouss at mtu.edu> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 13:18 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> >> fre 2012-09-14 klockan 21:58 -0500 skrev Eric Stuyvesant:
> >>
> >> > Yeah, and 2ghz dualcore A15 as well. Wowwww is right.
> >>
> >> Does it fit in eoma power profile?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Henrik
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > If not, there's always underclocking, right?
> >
> > Hey, if USB 3.0 can provide nearly 10 W of power, how does the card stay
> > under 5W? Or, does the card just provide the data lines, and the power
> > lines come from the chassis?
> > Actually, I'm dumb. Of course the power lines aren't coming directly
> > from the CPU.
>
> :)
>
> > Well, I'll record that anyway, and mention that USB 3.0
> > provides more power for accessories. Yay.
> > I'll also add that according to http://www.usb.org/developers/onthego/
> > it looks like USB 3.0 can support OTG as well (if the chip does),
> > allowing the card to act as the master while power is delivered in.
> > With 5W max dissipated in the card, that'd allow a battery to charge
> > while being used, depending on the details of the ioboard.
>
> yyep.
>
> oh i forgot to answer the question about USB3, didn't i? well, i
> thought about it. it would be necessary to reduce the number of GPIOs
> to 12 from 16. i know, i know. i really should do that. i just like
> powers-of-two. *sigh*.
>
> l.
>
>
If you like powers of two: Reduce it to 8 GPIOs, and reserve the other
4 lines for some future (USB4.0, SATA4, etc.)
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list