[Arm-netbook] extraordinary claims ...

[Michael Zucchi]

All i've done is provided a link to public information which I 
summarised very briefly - it's the sort of thing I thought anyone would 
do when confronted with claims of unfair treatment where relevant 
information was readily available, check both sides.  But it is up to 
others to assess this information and make up their own mind.

As far as it comes to judgement (and honestly, you think it's ok to tell 
someone what they're allowed to think do you?), at best these are simply 
off-topic ramblings for this list, but I didn't state that previously, 
nor did I (or do I) ask for them to be `silenced'.

So I'm not sure what it is i am supposed to have deprived you of, it's 
not like I can ban this person from the list, and their email address is 
readily available to continue your conversation even if i could.

No harm done, i'll just go elsewhere with my time as clearly I have 
nothing to offer here.


On 07/07/12 22:00, lkcl luke wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 1:55 AM,<freebirds at fastmail.fm>  wrote:
>
>> I will continue to research ARM TrustZone and ARM TEE on my own and
>> refrain from posting on these topics.
>
>   so.   michael zucchi: congratulations.  you've just deprived me and
> everyone else on this list of access to an area of research into
> security, thanks to your inflexible belief system and your lack of
> tolerance for others.
>
>   don't *ever* do that again.  don't you DARE judge people.
>
>
>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012, at 09:56 AM, Michael Zucchi wrote:
>
>>> One can not easily verify the veracity of the other claims of this
>>> person, but the technical ones can be assessed by an expert: and seem to
>>> have been already.
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk
>