[Arm-netbook] EOMA68 pinout change may be needed
Baybal Ni
nikulinpi at gmail.com
Wed Jan 18 10:31:50 GMT 2012
I would stick to idea of keeping power pins at the same place as in
PCMCIA to prevent accidental damage.
On 17 January 2012 20:59, lkcl luke <luke.leighton at gmail.com> wrote:
> always good to check, eh?
>
> http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA-68#Pinouts_.28Version_1.0.29
> http://pinouts.ws/pcmcia-pinout.html
>
> anybody notice where the power pins come in, on PCMCIA? they drop
> right smack on EOMA68's ethernet TX lines. i'd therefore like to swap
> the GPIO group as a block to sit over the power pins of legacy PCMCIA.
>
> also, bari, what did you think of the idea of converting 2 GNDs to power?
> http://elinux.org/Talk:Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA-68
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2012-January/001822.html
>
> l.
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list