[Arm-netbook] progress... allwinnertech
Gordan Bobic
gordan at bobich.net
Thu Jan 5 11:02:12 GMT 2012
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:32:33 +0000, lkcl luke <luke.leighton at gmail.com>
wrote:
> ok jimmy spoke to allwinner tech, and the plot thickens... :)
> the engineering design house is wits-tech, which explains this:
> http://www.wits-tech.com/pages/board.jsp
>
> so we have been introduced to them - apologies but it's another
> 24-hr round-trip because it's of course end-of-day already, there.
>
>
> also, it looks like the tablet market has really really tanked.
> it's not surprising to anyone who has ever owned a tablet: i'm
> kinda surprised it took this long for people to catch on - maybe
> there are more suckers in the world than i anticipated :)
Who'd have thought!
</sarcasm>
Tablets work as a product if your customers are Apple fanbois that will
get anything with an Apple badge on it. But the reality is that once the
"mee too!" fad has worn off most people will realize that these aren't
really useful for most practical things. The cheap ones have neither the
battery life nor the performance to be a half-decent media consumption
device, and the expensive ones are going head to head with the Apple
product on price (albeit with better specs), but without the realization
on the part of the manufacturers that to pull an Apple they need fanbois
rather than normal users that buy a product that fits the requirements
rather than a product that follows the hype.
Bottom line - to make a tablet into a semi-useful device it has to have
sufficiently good performance and spectacular
fully-powered-on-with-screen-at-full-brightness battery life. Most cheap
tablets fail miserably by that criteria. I must have at least half a
dozen various ones on my desk, and most of them are half-finished
half-arsed products that aren't even worth the peanuts they sell for,
with the semi-exception of the ones that the community has embraced with
custom firmwares that work orders of magnitude better than the Android
firmware abortions that they originally shipped with. And by this
criteria I actually put the likes of Gome Apad/IRobot/Flytouch
lightyears ahead of the StorageOptions' Scroll that only has a shiny
aluminium back to show for it's 3x pricetag, while I am shocked that
StorageOptions, being a western (UK) company, has even failed to comply
with the GPL and release the required kernel sources.
</rant>
> luckily, we're designing around a flexible product concept...
This is actually to the advantage of this project because it means
there will be plenty of spare manufacturing capacity, which means faster
fabrication timescales and possibly lower production costs, too.
Gordan
More information about the arm-netbook
mailing list