[Arm-netbook] Good netbook based on Cortex-A9

[Alejandro Mery]

On 6 August 2012 12:59, Gordan Bobic <gordan at bobich.net> wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 10:53 AM, Barry Kauler wrote:
>> Guys,
>> I haven't read through all of this thread (there are 91 posts!) so
>> excuse me if my comments have already been discussed...
>>
>> I did see some posts about 10 inch screens have very high resolutions
>> these days, driven by the tablet market, and 11-12 inch screens being
>> less-available.
>>
>> However, from a saleability point of view, a "netbook size" product
>> should go for the biggest possible screen, with thin bezel.
>>
>> That would be a 11-12 inch screen. The product would be distinguished
>> from all the 10 inch predecessors, it would be more attractive to
>> buyers. The thinnest possible bezel is noticed by the discerning buyer
>> who is looking for biggest screen in most-portable product.
>>
>> Also, "old eyes" (like mine) are happier with a bigger screen. Even if
>> technically I would be able to see a 10 inch screen with the same
>> number of pixels, just as well, by perhaps being just a tad closer, my
>> prejudice is that I want the bigger screen.
>
> The problem is that 11-13" screens don't have high-res options
> available. You can get a 1920x1200 10" screen, but you cannot get that
> in 11, 12, 13 or 14" sizes. The next screen size with that res available
> is 15.4".
>
> That means that in the 11-14" range the requirements for higher res AND
> bigger screen at the same time cannot be reconciled.

but is that 10" super screen really available to us?