[Arm-netbook] CT-PC89E - success replicating boot from SDcard with switch in NON-factory-default setting

[Frans Pop]

On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>  so far we have 2 sets of empirical evidence supporting the
> hypothesis: adam's will lend a third.

All we have so far is "the system boots" with the switch in the alternative 
position. My point is that we don't seem to have any evidence at all from 
where the system actually booted.

> and yes, if someone wants to risk completely bricking their machine,
> change the NAND flash u-boot params, that makes it absolutely
> unequivocably clear.

No. I suggested changing the u-boot on the *SD* card, NOT on the NAND!

The whole point is to make the u-boot on the SD card different from the one 
on NAND. That way you could actually tell from where the system booted.

Making a change in u-boot on the SD card should be safe right? Or do you 
think that booting with the changed switch will automatically also flash 
the NAND?