[Arm-netbook] Logos

[Peter Carlson]

I vote the second as well.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017, 1:38 AM Mike Leimon <leimon at gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay, I feel like I should take a swing or two at this as well.
>
> In the following two cases, there isn't any special font being used. I'm
> just using inkscape to trace out the characters that I want show...
>
> http://imgur.com/GrnfRHe
>
> Of these two logos that I sent, my preference is for the second.
>
> My personal opinion is that you shouldn't try and get too hung up about
> the acronym that you are trying to capture and represent... (I say this
> even though I did my best to incorporate the letters... blah). I think
> sometimes that capturing the concept is more important than capturing the
> acronym.
>
> Case in point, take a look at the USB logo:
>
>
> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cId-qdXRcqg/UXE0Nya6FAI/AAAAAAAAAPU/8KGiICpEQa0/s1600/Logo+USB.JPG
>
> The logo is incredibly simple and doesn't try and spell out USB.. however,
> it does capture the essence of the interface and what it seeks to
> accomplish and I think that is what makes it memorable.
>
> That is really all I wanted to drop by and say.
> -Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/attachments/20170318/662a349b/attachment.html>