[Arm-netbook] GK802 for $70
spam.caminati at yahoo.com
Sat May 25 18:19:08 BST 2013
> 55 pages with about 6 packages per page, that's 330 packages.
Actually and currently, there are 4231 packages in the repo for the only architecture officially supported.
> i've said it twice now - this makes it three times: debian manages
> over THIRTY THOUSAND packages. they also manage i think it's 13
> different architectures.
I am forced to an unsubstantiated statement, but I think that more packages and archs
could be handled without exploding the package manager's size.
In general, I regard complexity as rarely excused by the size of the task at hand.
It is something to be tamed, which is a hard enterprise, but is also the essence of computer science, according to some.
This is especially true for an arm machine, where all the efforts of porting an OS on
could be killed by bloat and waste of the often limited resources.
Ironically, the current way of having packages in Army Core is to import them from Debian
through a script written by Core main developer.
That's because of the nasty complexity (here, too, I am convinced there is a lot of bloat to cut out)
of a typical GNU toolchain, which puts me down, AND because of the lack of a strict policy
on Core packagers about supplying a buildscript.
> the complexity level is therefore at least three orders of magnitude
> greater between what tinycorelinux does and what debian does.
I disagree that the amount of packages/archs is as strongly related to complexity as
you seem to suggest (rather, it would probably require a more careful separation of each package into -bin, -shared, -lib, -dev, etc...).
More concretely, Core pkgman already supports different kernel versions in an
utterly simple manner; I am positive that a similar mechanism could be used to face
More information about the arm-netbook