[Arm-netbook] Oh, the AllWinner A10S STB is only $33
luke.leighton at gmail.com
Tue Jun 25 10:07:11 BST 2013
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:36 AM, joem <joem at martindale-electric.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 17:03 +0100, luke.leighton wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Jacky Lau <i90091e at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Are there any plan to develop a ultra low cost EOMA (cf?) module based
>> > on A10S?
>> does it have SATA? if not, then adding a USB Hub ($1.50 of
>> components) and a USB-to-SATA converter ($1.00 of components) entirely
>> defeats the object of "ultra low cost" :)
>> when comparing SoCs it's necessary to compare the *entire* BOM not
>> just the SoC's cost. PMIC, support ICs, DRAM, NAND, connectors -
> Inevitable someone will do cut down version of EOMA.
that's fine as long as it's not the same connector / casework
> It wrecks interchangeability.
yes - which is why i'm not going to do that. ever. the lesson from
X25 and more recently Q-Seven and to some extent COM-Express (with
physical size variants) is very very clear: under ABSOLUTELY NO
CIRCUMSTANCES make anything "optional" [*1]
> But as its inevitable, you might as well recommend
> something for its infrastructure into the EOMA fold such as naming
> derivatives e.g. EOMA68-Sata which reads EOMA68 minus Sata.
not in the same casework / connector - absolutely not.
the only thing is: we're running out of connectors/caseworks to
re-purpose. ExpressCard is a possibility, for re-use with a
severely-cut-down set of interfaces. only 26 pins is reallly tight
though. but, if no SATA and no Ethernet and say LVDS, it'd be doable.
[*1] except unless it's done at the physical/firmware-negotiation
level such as multi-lane PCIe, USB1 thru 3, SATA1 thru 3, or 10 thru
More information about the arm-netbook