[Arm-netbook] EOMA server standard

[luke.leighton]

On 10/23/12, Simon Kenyon <simon at koala.ie> wrote:
> On 10/23/12 18:09, luke.leighton wrote:
>> so the question i'm raising is: what would people see as being the
>> most appropriate general-purpose and lowest-common-denominator
>> "upgradeable" interfaces to have on an EOMA standard?  and, what case
>> would be good to re-use?
>
> standard for what?

 a server module.  apologies if that wasn't clear.

 l.