[Arm-netbook] Raspberry Pi, Allwinner, and CuBox in the Linux hardware race to tiniest and cheapest

[Vladimir Pantelic]

Baybal Ni wrote:
> Can somebody correct them? We are developing EOMA, not the chip itself

I doubt they understood the difference, to them "A10" is the board...

>
> On 7 March 2012 01:35, Gordan Bobic<gordan at bobich.net>  wrote:
>>  Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
>>>  http://opensource.com/life/12/1/linux-hardware-race-tiniest-and-cheapest-15-cheap?sc_cid=70160000000TlY9AAK
>>>
>>>  personally I think that pissing contest between r-pi,
>>>  beagle, panda et al is just plain stupid...
>>
>>  CuBox isn't really comparable to the R-Pi. It is a much, much better
>>  piece of kit. Then again, the Allwinner A10 is better still.
>>
>>  What we desperately need isn't cheaper ARM machines - it is _better_ ARM
>>  machines, particularly WRT the amount of RAM. Once you start requiring
>>  more than 512MB, the field narrows very dramatically and the costs
>>  multiply by a substantial factor.
>>
>>  Gordan
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
>>  http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
>>  Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook at lists.phcomp.co.uk
> http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
> Send large attachments to arm-netbook at files.phcomp.co.uk